Ike is a Good Dog!

The story Dear Mr. LaRue talks about a dog named Ike. He did 4 things wrong. So, he got sent to a Dog school. Ike thinks that the dog school is like a prison. He thinks that being in a dog school is like being in a prison. He did five things wrong. He chased the neighbors cats. He tore his owner’s camel hair coat. And a lot of more things. Ike writes to his owner everyday. He writes about why he should not be in that dog school and why he should be freed. I think that what he said is correct. He should not be sent to prison. Which is the dog school. He thinks that he should not be sent in. I also believe that he should not be sent to the dog school. 

  Without a reminder, a wrong thing might not be wrong. A lot of dogs steal food from their owners, it's not only Ike. A lot of dogs do that. Dogs like eating, that is like a natural habit of a dog. In the story, Ike just eats the chicken pie. I don’t think that he stole the food. The food is on the table. He ate it, I think that it is pretty normal. And also, which dog doesn't like eating. This should not be a reason to put him into a dog school. And also, the owner should have communicated with him. If he communicated with him, I’m sure that Ike would not eat it. So, Ike is actually not wrong. He just wants to eat. Eating is like a natural habit for a dog. 

  Ike did not mean to tear down the coat, it was by accident. Most dogs want to tear things. Most dogs tear things down. That is the same with the food one, it is a dog’s habit. It's like a human loves money. This is a dog habit that we cannot change. The dogs that we see that are really good, they have been through prison school. We cannot take away a natural habit of a dog. Ike tore down his owner’s camel fur coat. This is something wrong, but it is just a natural habit of a dog. A dog loves doing these kinds of things. 

  Kind protection becomes an unjust sin. This is really unfair. He only wants to protect the habbin’s cats, but everyone thinks that he is chasing the habbin’s cats. All he wants to do is protect them. But sadly, he got questioned. In the story, Ike chased them because Ike wants them to be far away from the fire escape. The fire escape is a really dangerous place to go. He should be alarmed. It is actually a good thing that he is sensible about danger. He is sensible about the Habbin’s cats. So he chased them away. I think that it is actually a really good action of a dog. 

  Banning dogs from howling, that's not correct. Dogs like to howl, just like humans are talkative. Howling is like talking to a dog. Banning a dog from howling is just like banning a human from talking. That's a dog’s natural habitat. We cannot ban that. In the story, Mrs.LaRue banned Ike from howling. That's really painful for a dog. A dog cannot stop howling. A dog needs to howl just like people need to talk. Dogs that don’t howl live are really painful. This is like shutting people’s mouths. It's actually really painful for a dog. A dog wants to howl, and they need to howl. We cannot ban that. And also, Ike is pretty kind, he howled when Mrs.LaRue was away, so he would not disturb Mrs.LaRue. 

  In conclusion, Ike did nothing wrong. Ike has a good mind. He chased the Habbin’s cats because he wanted to protect them from danger. He howls because it is a natural habit of a dog. It's like a talking habit to a dog. A dog howling is a normal habit for them. We cannot stop it. He teared the camel shirt, it's a accident. He tore it by accident. He did not mean to tear it. He did it all by accident. He’s trying to protect Mrs.LaRue. He ate the chicken pie because nobody told him not to eat it. He just ate it. So, Ike did nothing wrong.